|
|
June 27, 2007
Anybody for a Free Degree?
Recently another one of
those stupid government policies, supported by even stupider arguments, was
brought to my attention on a state-run, taxpayer-financed radio station.
I know very well that the
Swedish government finances all education with what the government goons have
looted from the working populace. And I know there is a general student
financing program too, to cover any expenses for those poor people choosing to
get a degree or two already paid for. Part of this financing scheme is loan
(guaranteed by the government), part of it is a grant offered to anyone passing
most (not all) of the classes taken.
Still the radio show made
me aware of the magnitude of this system. It opened up my eyes for the reason so
many students from abroad come to visit Swedish universities--and why they stay
for so long. The reason? Our government forces Swedish taxpayers to give the
same kind of financing to foreign students as well. Actually, it is
illegal to ask foreigners to pay tuition, and it is illegal to
deny foreigners the grants and subsidized loans. So why do foreign students go
to Sweden to study? Well, who can blame them--this is kind of the free lunch Robert A.
Heinlein claimed doesn’t exist.
For those of you not
knowing what the very generous government education system in Sweden is about
and what it covers, let me simply say it covers EVERYTHING. You won’t get rich
from the grants and loans, but you certainly won’t get poor either. And you
certainly don’t have to worry if you want to go to graduate school to get a
master’s or doctorate; it is all paid for by the heavily taxed Swedish populace.
Actually, if you’re aiming for a doctorate you will get a salary for the four or
five years it will take you to earn that degree. There is no such thing as
tuition at any of the universities.
You might think this is a
way for politicians to find a way to spend more money than they "have to" and
therefore they make this a secret. No, that’s not how it is--there’s a whole
web site on the how’s and why’s of studying in Sweden, advertising the
fact that it is all at Swedish taxpayers’ expense: www.studyinsweden.se.
This, I think, probably
strikes at the core (well, one of them) of what modern socialism is all about:
stop as many immigrants as possible at the border to keep the people inborn and
ignorant of the world, but waste taxpayers’ money to advertise the glorious
welfare state by subsidizing foreigners only temporarily in the country and thus
never contributing to the welfare system. This is, actually, what most western
states are doing and have been doing for quite a while. The U.S. government, for
instance, issues visas to students who get their degrees at U.S.
state-subsidized universities, but then forces them to leave the country as soon
as they’ve earned their degrees. One would think it more rational to ask them to
stay to work and pay taxes, but that is obviously not a valid conclusion in
political reasoning.
Knowing about the
educational dimension of the Swedish welfare state, the most pressing question
on any rational person’s mind should be: why does the Swedish government offer
free education to foreign students--and why does it even offer to pay
them to study? The reason was briefly suggested in the same radio show, and it
is a thoroughly political reason. The politicians want to show Sweden to the
world as a generous and prosperous (well...) welfare state, while at the same time
avoid confronting the people on the issues.
Apart from the state
marketing scheme, it seems the socialists in government simply don’t want
foreigners to pay tuition to Swedish taxpayers-financed universities, since that
might make Swedes more prone to accept paying for education. If the issue
is raised, the socialists would have to face the fact that foreigners pay for
education in Sweden (and can afford to do so). That is simply too
"costly" politically speaking.
But isn’t it more costly to
let Swedish taxpayers pay for educating the whole world? Of course, but this
kind of economic reasoning makes sense only to the non-political a.k.a.
real world. In politics, benefit is defined as what can be bought at
someone else’s expense, at gunpoint if necessary, and cost is only expressed in
terms of loss of power and risk of people calling the political bluff. Thus: it
is cheaper, politically speaking, to force the nine million Swedes to finance
universities for whoever wants free education in a world of more than six
billion people.
It never fails to amaze me,
this political logic. I know everything about it--I’ve seen it from behind the
scenes--yet I am truly surprised, almost on a daily basis, at the stupidity and
ignorance of the political class. However could they, the stupid,
ignorant, and moronic people unable to produce anything themselves, become our
rulers?
Subscribe to the PerBylund.com Update! Subscribers receive a short e-mail message every time one of Per Bylund’s columns is published, with a synopsis and link.
Subscribe here: www.PerBylund.com/notifier/?p=subscribe
|
|
|
|
|
|