There’s something that has been troubling me lately. Most people in the PhD program that I attend are of course well educated people, and they are getting even more so as time goes by, but one of their main interests outside of the department and their classes seems to be television (possibly because they need some non-demanding relaxation after their hard seven-days-a-week work as soon-to-be “real” researchers). And when discussing with non-academics it seems everything is about television.
Not only do people have their favorite TV shows or series that they follow slavishly, they seem to prefer spending a couple of hours more zapping to social interaction. Some people go home, even though they are having a great time with friends, just to make sure not to miss out on whatever is on the hundreds of channels they have. And if they miss the weekly episode of their favorite series – life crisis.
[ad#righthandside-tall]The television series Lost seems to have this effect on people. I watched the first two seasons on the ABC web site just to see what it was all about. It is a strange series consisting of numerous flashbacks to weird people’s lives prior to the crash of their plane on some deserted island, that became increasingly horrible as I watched episode after episode. The reason it was horrible was not that the story is made in such a way that you feel you “need” to see the next episode (which is always the case), but the underlying philosophy.
The last episode of the second season ends with a between-the-lines philosophical punch in the stomach: things are found and understood thanks to the drug-lord-became-fake-priest “Mr. Echo” seeing his dead brother running around in the bushes and giving Echo advice. And John Locke, who has stopped believing, saves the day thanks to giving up whatever reason and rationality there is in him – to believe again.
In what does he believe? It is not in God or anything like that – it is a belief in reason being unreasonable. His belief consists of him and everything being destined to do certain things and follow whatever signs that can be identified. I guess we’re all just blind in the dark and need to be taught that we cannot trust ourselves or our intelligence. Things are always incomprehensible and we should just “go with the flow”…follow any whim or impulse and you will come out on top of things.
What are we supposed to learn from the show Lost? Obviously that your brain is not for using – there is no reason in the world that can save you if you don’t believe in the impossible and totally outrageous. Kind of the “hip” anti-enlightenment sentiment of the 20th century turning to a hyper-anti-thinking-ideal.
Lost is for sure not the only show preaching the same message; most TV productions have some degree of anti-reason mysti-glorifying hidden agenda.
But even if we don’t accept this rather obvious fact, perhaps because we regularly watch the crap and have already accepted some of the broadcast morality, there are reasons to quit watching whatever happens to be on for the moment.
As I mentioned in the beginning of this post, even well educated people turn on their television sets when they get home at night – and they slavishly follow some series or show. TV is the main source of information and understanding of the world as it is today, which means television has gained enormous powers. Even Internet, which is often mentioned as a popular and revolutionizing means to consume non-mainstream news and reporting, is used to watch TV shows that you’ve missed. So Internet seems to function partly as a next generation VCR, with which you can watch the shows that you missed – and that gives you an opportunity to preview future shows (legally or illegally).
The ongoing primaries in the republicrat party shows clearly what impact television has on people’s thinking: whoever is on television most wins. The media, or whoever controls it, has thereby the power to choose a candidate through deciding who gets to be seen and who doesn’t.
Even the news are streamlined to not upset anyone and to paint a picture of some things being a whole lot better than they are, and some things being terribly bad (even though they’re not). The sad truth is that people’s beliefs depend on television – whatever is on decides how you think, what you think, and when to think it.
Lost is just one of the examples of a show that very clearly expresses what is going on. You have to believe; if you think freely, independently, and without “guidance” you are or will get in trouble. Don’t criticize or think about what it is you are watching and whether it makes sense – just sit back, relax, and “enjoy.”
Television is the perfect means for brain washing a population – because it is one-way only. It may offer some interactive features (like changing channels), but what is broadcast is produced in a protected environment and fully controlled by the people producing it. It is not a substitute for a good conversation with an intellectual person, or even taking part in a discussion forum on some web site – it is the very opposite.
A discussion with other people is non-controllable and non-foreseeable; you have to always pay attention to not lose touch with the discussion. And the most important thing about a conversation is: you don’t want to be just a recipient of “truths.” In a conversation, for it to be a good conversation (or even a conversation at all) you need to take part. And you won’t accept someone else’s views just because “he says so,” for the outcome of the discussion – whether you like it or not – is the result partly of your doing (so why give it up?). It might be upsetting, disturbing, or someone might even be lying – but somehow you won’t settle for anyone’s opinions just because they are worded. You feel obligated to criticize and think yourself.
TV works the other way. It is supposed to be entertainment and therefore it delivers nothing that makes you upset, and whatever is broadcast is made as easy to swallow as possible. Just sit back, relax, and let yourself be fed the entertainment.
Have a look at the news – it too is entertainment. News reports are made shorter and shorter, so that you can go back to seeing your favorite show sooner. And still the news reports have gone through numerous layers of mainstreaming (censoring) so that whatever is reported is thoroughly controlled. There’s no room for surprises and no reports that tease your brain to start producing its own thoughts or penetrating lies. Sometimes they make you react to them, but trust me – the way you react is a result of how the report is put together, not of your independent assessment of the facts.
Imagine if you were the ruler of the land – what would you do to keep such a mass of people in check? You need to make them believe in you and the system, otherwise they might challenge it. How do you do that? You make them think everything is alright, that someone else is making the tough decisions – that someone else is answering the “red phone” in the middle of the night so that you can relax and continue to let yourself be entertained.
There’s a reason TV programming is broadcast almost exclusively by mammoth networks. It is easier to control a few huge networks, or to form alliances with them, and then “protect” the “competition” in the market for TV entertainment through setting up barriers to “hostile” competitors. Who gets to “entertain” the populace is not a result of providing the best programming, it is a result of getting the right permits.
Have you ever wondered about this obsession about television in this country? Ever wondered why people stay at home passively letting themselves be showered by the “boob tube” instead of going out to meet people? We’re programmed through evolution to save our energy, so TV fits us perfectly: there’s no need to go anywhere, we don’t need to socially interact (which could be both stressful and energy-consuming), and we don’t even have to think. Just keep those eyes open and let the brain get soaked with whatever “is on.” So television seems to be the perfect tool for keeping us satisfied at the lowest possible level, while keeping us from the truth and life itself.
Am I wrong? Then consider a normal conversation between friends in almost any setting. What do you usually talk about with people? Television, and perhaps also the latest neighborhood gossip, and the weather. Nothing that really means anything or that keeps your intellect alert. Your brain turns to mush while you are letting yourself be passively entertained, spending hours in your favorite armchair with a deadish, fixed smile on your lips.
The truth is that any “normal” conversation today is always about television: “Did you see that show last night about [whatever]?” – “No, did you really miss the latest episode of [fill in the blank]? It was sooo cool, I wonder what’s going to happen next…” – “Do you remember that move about the guy who did that thing? What was it called…? Yes, that one – have you seen it too? That was awesome.” And so on.
Where does this fascination come from? I don’t know, but I do know that people are fascinated and they spend hours in front of their television sets watching shows they don’t really like. How often don’t you hear people claim there’s “only crap” on? Yet they don’t turn the television set off – they cannot, because what would they do if they didn’t have a distraction to passively stimulate the irises?
Have you ever wondered what you would do without television? Does the thought terrify you? The fact that the thought of living without television terrifies you is indeed terrifying. Who knows what kind of baloney you’re fed – and what it makes you believe. Aren’t you afraid of what television makes you?
Imagine a land where everybody is fixed to watching television. Do you sincerely believe that such a population could not be subject to some kind of propaganda? Imagine if one of the “great” dictators of history had had a population addicted to television – it would not have made their ends harder to accomplish. Television serves as both a great “teaching” device and as a distraction – if you are watching you cannot know what is going on around you.
If someone, with or without uniform, would break into your neighbor’s house and pull them out of there kicking and screaming. Would you then turn off your television set and go outside to see for yourself what is going on – and help the people you know?
Or would you have a quick look and then continue zapping…or perhaps just turn up the volume…?
For more on this topic, see The Media and Power and Rejecting Television.
HotConflict says
It is an amazing work of art. There is something mesmerizing in the way they have created the stories and characters.
The issue of belief and mass hysteria in the reactions of the Oceanic 815 Flight are interesting to watch.
The place of religion and faith for the characters cause the audience to have to question their own personal assumptions of belief.
Check out this episode of the HotConflict radio show discussing belief and faith on the hit TV series LOST.
http://www.hotconflict.com/blog/2008/03/lost—religion.html
Francois Tremblay says
I agree with all the points you raise in your entry. My wife and I have been discussing eliminating television from our lives. The few shows we do love due to their intellectual content or freethought-ness are available on the Internet or on DVD.
Per Bylund says
Responding to Francois,
I was “introduced” to the idea of not having a television set when I met my wife – she hadn’t had one for years. At first I was very skeptical, since every day after work all I did was turn it on and passively watch what happened to be on. After throwing out the television, I suddenly had multiple hours every night that I had no idea that I had – there was suddenly a large chunk of life “extra” for me to use and enjoy.
What’s interesting is that I don’t miss having a television set at all – I use the Internet when I “have to” see something, and I go to the movies as a social event (rather than just waste time). Life is a whole lot better without television.
Royce Christian says
HotConflict,
Lost is ridiculous. It goes no where, fast. There’s always this sense of a foreboding, dark, storyline but you rarely ever get any information. “Family Guy” is better and its a cartoon with no plot or characters that trades solely off the stupidity of its characters.
Rorshak says
Haha, after reading this I just realized that I haven’t turned on my TV in 2 or 3 months.
Eric Sundwall says
I love My Name is Earl, but the writer’s strike has freed up that time recently.
Battlestar Galactica is coming back in April, but I’m still trying to finish “But Who Build the Roads ?” (and many others) and yet I derive no income or future tenure from the activity. While I don’t have a Tivo or equivalent, one would think that those attached or addicted to such things, as the author suggests, could easily employ such devices with little effort in order to preserve the experience and not lose valuable associations elsewhere.
Isn’t this just an example of another type of elitism ? I still read, write and catch some tube occasionally despite the demands of a profession, an old house and a small family. Watching the tube is still voluntary, or so it seems.
Per Bylund says
Eric,
Watching television per se need not be a problem, even though it is (I believe) a perfect tool for someone interested in brainwashing (since it allows the broadcaster to totally control content and presentation). The problem is when a population is dependent on television, which is the case in the USA. I don’t say you are automatically brain washed if you watch My Name is Earl, but if you tend to watch television rather than do other things, if you use television as your main (or only) source of information, and if you believe what is on television – then we have a problem.
Americans love their television and most of them wouldn’t want to live without them. In such a society, what is the effect of government effectively controling what is broadcast? After all, government has rules of what can and what cannot be said, when certain things cannot be broadcast and what cannot be broadcast, as well as who can broadcast.
Television being only about entertainment suits the elite perfectly – the more people are “entertained” and the less they are thinking about important things that affect their lives, the better. If people would rather watch the latest episode of a sit com than watch a documentary on power abuse and Constitution-bashing by Washington, DC, then who benefits?
Why do people believe there is a war going on between Muslims (“islamofascists”) and America and that America “has been attacked”? Is it because there is a war or because the US government wants people to believe so? The horrible thing that happened on 9/11 was certainly some kind of attack, but it wasn’t an attack that initiated a war – it was an attack after the people in the Middle East having been repeatedly assaulted by the US government. Who started the war?
I’m not saying everything on television is necessarily biased or controlled. I’m saying that it is dangerous to have one main source of information, especially if the source is as controllable and controlled as television. It is much like JS Mill’s argument for free speech – if we don’t allow many ideas to “fight” each other, we can never tell which is true. If people watch television, thereby being fed “one side” of the story and otherwise being kept from asking questions, then who is to gain?
Television as a huge industry is clearly in the interest of government.
Sophie McKeand says
Have any of you read Adbusters mag? They originally championed ‘turn off TV week’ ‘buy nothing day’ etc…
have a look at http://www.adbusters.org
Jesse says
Another great article Per,
I concur. I moved to China from the USA 3 years ago, and haven’t been able to watch TV during this time. But when I go home once a year to visit home, and turn on the TV, I can’t believe what passes as political philosophy on the tube. Sick, sad, evil, frightening. It’s 1984, but without the intent. I’m always glad to get out of there.
Aaron Kinney says
The only shows I watch are Simpsons and South Park and Carl Sagan’s Cosmos which is replaying on Science Channel. Now that’s some good freethought TV.